What Are the Most Popular Rankings for Business Master’s Programs?
There are a range of business school, university, and MBA rankings out there. In this guide, we are going to focus on two of the most widely recognized in the field of business master’s programs:
- Financial Times Business Master’s Rankings
- QS Business Master’s Rankings
These two annually published lists are generally considered the most reliable, up-to-date, and widely read. Both high-quality rankings offer valuable insights, but they differ in methodology and weighting criteria. Understanding these differences will help you determine which ranking is most relevant to your career goals.
Now, let’s dive into how Financial Times and QS business master’s rankings compare.
How the Business Master’s Rankings Compare
Financial Times Business Master’s Rankings
The Financial Times publishes several rankings each year. Along with ranking the top MBAs in the world, FT also publishes a list of the best Master’s in Finance and Master’s in Management programs.
Both use similar criteria to arrive at the final ranking. Topics such as salary, international outlook, research output, and career progress form the basis for ranking criteria.
Alumni survey responses make up 58% of the total weighting of the FT Masters in Finance Methodology. The remaining 42% comes from school data. The weighting is the same for the FT Masters in Management Methodology.
The FT rankings largely draw from alumni salary data, which accounts for 40% of the ranking criteria. Within this category, they measure salary today, salary percentage increase, and value for money.
FT Methodology Breakdown
The Financial Times rankings heavily rely on alumni salary data, which makes up 40% of the ranking score. The key evaluation criteria include:
- Salary today and percentage increase
- Value for money
- Career progress
- Gender parity in students, faculty, and on the board
- International course experience
- Faculty research output
- Carbon footprint
QS Business Master’s Rankings
QS publishes five different business master’s rankings: Business Analytics, Finance, Management, Marketing, and Supply Chain Management. They all use the same, or very similar, ranking methodology.
The QS World University Rankings is a straight 50/50 split between surveys and school data. Whereas only 30-35% of the data in the QS Business Master’s Rankings come from survey results.
This contrasts with the Financial Times, which relies on alumni surveys for their rankings. The Financial Times emphasizes alumni salaries in their methodology. QS chooses to focus on employability, which accounts for 30-35% of the total weighting.
To gather the data on post-graduate employment, they ask employers worldwide which schools they tend to hire from.
QS Methodology Breakdown
Unlike the Financial Times, QS focuses more on employability, measured through surveys from global employers. Their ranking criteria include:
- Employability – 35% (30% – Finance/Business Analytics)
- Alumni Outcomes – 15% (20% Finance/Business Analytics)
- Value for Money – 20%
- Thought Leadership – 20%
- Class & Faculty Diversity – 10%
Top 10 Lists: Best Business Master’s Rankings 2025
Financial Times Master’s in Finance Ranking 2024
- ESCP Business School (France)
- HEC Paris (France)
- Skema Business School (France)
- ESSEC Business School (France)
- Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management (China)
- EDHEC Business School (France)
- Nova School of Business and Economics (Portugal)
- Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance at SJTU (China)
- University of Oxford: Saïd Business School(UK)
- London Business School (UK)
Financial Times Master’s in Management Ranking 2024
- University of St.Gallen (Switzerland)
- HEC Paris (France)
- INSEAD (France)
- EDHEC Business School (France)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University: Antai (China)
- ESCP Business School (France)
- London Business School (UK)
- Emlyon Business School (France)
- Nova School of Business and Economics (Portugal)
- ESSEC Business School (France)
QS Master’s in Finance Ranking 2025
- University of Oxford: Saïd Business School(UK)
- HEC Paris (France)
- MIT Sloan School of Management (USA)
- London Business School (UK)
- Cambridge Judge (UK)
- UC Berkeley/Haas (USA)
- ESSEC Business School (France)
- Yale School of Management (USA)
- London School of Economics (UK)
- UCLA Anderson (USA)
QS Master’s in Management Ranking 2025
- HEC Paris (France)
- Stanford Graduate School of Business (USA)
- ESSEC Business School (France)
- London Business School (UK)
- MIT Sloan School of Management (USA)
- INSEAD (France)
- Yale School of Management (USA)
- ESCP Business School (France)
- IE Business School (Spain)
- CEMS (France)
QS Master’s in Marketing Ranking 2025
- HEC Paris (France)
- ESSEC Business School (France)
- IE Business School (Spain)
- ESCP Business School (France)
- Columbia University (USA)
- Imperial College Business School (UK)
- Warwick Business School (UK)
- Emlyon Business School (France)
- Esade Business School (Spain)
- EDHEC Business School (France)
QS Master’s in Business Analytics Ranking 2025
- MIT Sloan School of Management (USA)
- UCLA/Anderson (USA)
- ESSEC/CentraleSupélec (France)
- Ecole Polytechnique/HEC Paris (France)
- London Business School (UK)
- Columbia University (USA)
- Duke/Fuqua (USA)
- Imperial College Business School (UK)
- ESCP Business School (France)
- IE Business School (Spain)
QS Master’s in Supply Chain Management Ranking 2025
- Michigan/Ross (USA)
- WU Vienna University of Economics and Business (Austria)
- Erasmus RSM (Netherlands)
- Emlyon Business School (France)
- USC Marshall (USA)
- Manchester/Alliance (UK)
- POLIMI School of Management (Italy)
- Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin (Ireland)
- Washington/Foster (USA)
- HKUST (Hong Kong SAR)
*Last Updated 21 March 2025.
How To Use Rankings To Choose Your Master’s Program
Use Rankings As A Starting Point
With so many master’s programs out there, it can be difficult to know where to start looking. These lists break the task down into subject areas, countries, and institutions. This way you have a good idea of the scope of information on which to base your final decision.
Look Beyond the Overall Ranking
It’s also important to look beyond the rankings: don’t judge a program based solely on its overall position. Where possible, dig a little deeper into the list and find out how it ranks for the things that matter to you. That may be salary growth, employability, or international exposure. Look for schools that reflect your values, be it gender equality, sustainability, or diversity.
Consider What Matters to You
You may also want to consider the ranking bodies themselves. Take a look through the criteria for each ranking and try to find the rankings that align with your own beliefs and ambitions. Some rankings place a greater emphasis on student and academic surveys, while others base their methodology on school data. Consider what you value most: the opinions of employers, academics, and students, or quantitative data from schools.
Analyze Trends Over Time
Analyzing the performance of a school over several years is a good way to compare institutions and whether they are improving. Visit the Financial Times Ranking History, and review results from the past few years. Or go to QS Business Master’s Rankings and filter by year, where you can go as far back as 2022.
Rankings should never be the only thing you base your study decision on. But they can help you begin the process of finding a master’s program. Use rankings to shortlist schools, then dive deeper into their curriculum, career services, faculty, and alumni network.
Understanding how rankings work will help you make an informed decision for your business master’s degree in 2025. If you understand how to use them to your advantage, you’ll be one step closer to finding your dream program.
Looking for the latest master’s program rankings? Visit our master’s rankings page to explore more.